<?xml version='1.0'  encoding='iso-8859-1' ?>
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' >
<channel>
<atom:link href='http://www.cpbf.org.uk/rss.xml' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
<title>CPBF</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk</link>
<description>Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom News Feed</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, CPBF</copyright>
<managingEditor>gherman@KeywordsAssociates.com (Gary Herman)</managingEditor>
<webMaster>webmaster@cpbf.org.uk (Gary Herman)</webMaster>

<item>
<title>[CPBF]
Alastair Campbell at Leveson: great theatre Mr Jay, shame about the questions
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2717</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2717</guid>
<description> DATELINE: 15/5/12 Alastair Campbell has rarely missed an opportunity to launch a demolition job on journalism and in the second round of his evidence to the Leveson Inquiry he was given free rein to go back onto the attack: he claimed David Cameron, Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband were all getting andquot;disproportionately whackedandquot; by the press in retaliation for having given their backing to Lord Justice Levesonand#39;s investigation into media ethics. </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>[CPBF]
Phone-hacking police charge Rebekah Brooks
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2716</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2716</guid>
<description> DATELINE: 15/5/12 Rebekah Brooks and her husband, Charlie, are being charged with perverting the course of justice as part of the phone hacking inquiry. She was arrested on 13 March as part of the Met Policeand#39;s Operation Weeting. In a statement, they accused the CPS of andquot;posturingandquot; and said: andquot;We deplore this weak and unjust decision.andquot; The couple will become the first suspects to be charged in an inquiry lasting 18 months and involving 185 police officers and staff.        </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>[CPBF]
Brooks at Leveson: an insight into how the Sun exploited the political endorsement of the Murdoch press
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2715</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2715</guid>
<description> DATELINE: 13/5/12 Having been disadvantaged so often by the ability of the Murdoch press to deliver politically-inspired exclusives, I found Rebekah Brooksand#39; testimony to the Leveson Inquiry a telling confirmation of what I and most other journalists had always suspected: the Sun and the News of the World had no scruples when it came to exploiting the privileged access which their editors enjoyed in return for the political endorsement of their papers.        </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>[CPBF]
Coulson at Leveson: a former spin doctor's master class in closing down unhelpful questions
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2714</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2714</guid>
<description> DATELINE: 13/5/12 David Cameronand#39;s former spin doctor Andy Coulson gave an assured account of himself before the Leveson inquiry into press standards andndash; he certainly avoided giving any incriminating answers about the way the coalition government dealt with News Corporationand#39;s controversial bid for full control of BSkyB. </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>[CPBF]
Cameron puts brakes on his planned reform of lobbying
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2713</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2713</guid>
<description> DATELINE: 12/5/12 The Government has downgraded its radical proposals to overhaul the lobbying industry in one of a series of U-turns contained in the Queenand#39;s Speech. The creation of a statutory register of lobbyists is expected to be included in next yearand#39;s Queenand#39;s Speech andmdash; but only in draft form, signalling that it could be years before any actual change is introduced. This is despite the priority that David Cameron attached to reforming lobbying, which he called the andquot;next big scandal waiting to happenandquot;.        </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>[CPBF]
New Defamation Bill welcomed by Index
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2712</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2712</guid>
<description> DATELINE: 9/5/12 Index Against Censorship has welcomed the announcement that a defamation bill is being included in the coalition governmentand#39;s new legislative programme. According to Index: and#39;This will be the first wholesale attempt at reform since 1843 and an amazing achievement for the campaign and its 60,000 supporters. The bill will open the way to ending libel tourism and protecting free expression for journalists, writers, bloggers and scientists around the world. However, there is still work to be done and we will carry on fighting to make sure that the detail in the final Bill will truly deliver reform.and#39;        </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>[CPBF]
It's not just about Murdoch - the whole system needs fixing
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2711</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2711</guid>
<description> DATELINE: 9/5/12 This week we are likely to see yet more drama and revelations in the saga that is the Leveson Inquiry as the prime ministerand#39;s former spin doctor Andy Coulson and former Sun editor and horse owner Rebekah Brooks take the stand. You may be starting to tire of the blanket coverage but please donand#39;t switch off just yet. There are big issues at stake.        </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>[CPBF]
New Podcast: post Murdoch where is Leveson Inquiry going?
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2710</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2710</guid>
<description> DATELINE: 9/5/12 In their evidence to the Leveson Inquiry Rupert and James Murdoch left more questions unanswered than resolved...but their testimony was definitely a telling curtain raiser to the forthcoming appearances before Lord Justice Leveson of past and present Prime Ministers and ministers. In a new podcast recorded for the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, a panel of commentators give their assessment of where the Leveson Inquiry should go next after the Murdochsand#39; testimony. Nicholas Jones was joined by Ann Field, organiser of the exhibition commemorating the 25th anniversary of the Wapping dispute, Joy Johnson lecturer in politics and journalism and former director of media for Ken Livingstone as Mayor of London, and Tim Gopsill, former editor of The Journalist and currently editor of the CPBFand#39;s journal Free Press.         </description>
</item>
<item>
<title>[CPBF]
Leveson After Murdoch
</title>
<link>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2709</link>
<guid>http://www.cpbf.org.uk/body.php?id=2709</guid>
<description>         DATELINE: 8/5/12 In their evidence to the Leveson Inquiry, Rupert and James Murdoch left more questions unanswered than resolved... but their testimony was definitely a telling curtain raiser to the forthcoming appearances before Lord Justice Leveson of past and present Prime Ministers and ministers.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
