» SubscribeMain section
-
Top story
A “right to be forgotten”: is European Union offering a false prospectus for data protection?
Nicholas Jones
DATELINE: 10/3/12
Grave doubts about whether data protection authorities in Britain and across the European Union can ever deliver on a “right to be forgotten” were expressed at seminar organised by the Westminster Forum. Both the Ministry of Justice and the UK Information Commissioner believe the newly-published European data protection framework review is in danger of raising “false expectations” on the part of the public about the possibility of individuals deleting personal information.
There was criticism at the seminar (8.3.2012) of what one speaker described as the “political gesturing” of the EU’s Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding.Lord McNally, Minister of State at the Ministry of Justice, urged the EU to offer the twenty seven member states a workable solution. The right to erase data would not be possible if it related to health care, crime or a free press, nor could it apply to credit rating. “Businesses should have rights too...we must not undermine responsible lending or financial agreements. We may set the standard so high we don’t get a model which can work in practice.”
David Smith, the UK’s deputy Information Commissioner with responsibility for data protection, agreed with the Ministry of Justice that the EU framework needed clarifying. “So if we champion the ‘right to be forgotten’, a right to be deleted, and if that is not the case in practice, that leads to false expectations and a lot of dissatisfied individuals.” However, he welcomed several improvements in the framework. In future when personal information is being held electronically the individual will get the right of access to that data electronically. Another new safeguard was a shift in the balance of proof towards the individual. At the moment when individuals seek the removal of data it is necessary for them to provide “compelling, legitimate grounds” for deletion. That onus would now fall on data controllers and processors who would have to show why there were “compelling, legitimate business reasons” to continue processing the data.
An assurance that Facebook already complied fully with the “right to be forgotten” was given by Simon Milner, its director of public policy for the UK and Ireland. There was the right to “completely delete” all data. Users seeking to deactivate Facebook accounts could reassure themselves by downloading all the information they had ever posted and then deleting it.
But Facebook believed the EU framework was wrong to suggest that social networking sites should be required to ensure the deletion of data which had been copied on to other services; equally it was not practical to give people the right to delete anything which someone else had posted about an individual user. There other unanswered questions about how far third parties could go in deleting information.
In response to the criticism Peter Hustinx, the European Data Protection Supervisor, acknowledged that Viviane Reding had raised expectations when the framework review was published in January and there was a danger that individuals who sought to exercise the “right to be forgotten” might be disappointed.
In Commissioner Reding’s defence, he said that ever since she raised the prospect of a “right to be forgotten” it had attracted increasing interest. Perhaps it was the wrong translation and should relate to the ability to start “thinking about forgetting” the past. “We do need to organise the ‘forgetting’...she has invested capital in this idea and moved it from the margins to centre stage.”
The original EU directive on data protection dated from 1995 and a review of the framework began in 2009. Negotiations with the twenty seven member states and the European Parliament would continue until “beyond the end of the year” and it would then take two years for the regulations to come into effect.
Lord McNally closed the session with a warning that issues raised by the “right to be forgotten” were only just emerging. Entrepreneurs would be tempted to set up data bases which would infringe this right.
There was already a case of data being used to produce black lists of workers in the construction industry and there would be others which would undoubtedly contravene the rehabilitation of offenders act. “How do we mesh in legislation with this amazing capacity to acquire and cross reference data...that really is a big problem coming down the track?”8.3.2012
Last modified: Saturday, March 10, 2012
Your comments:
» Click here to add your comment.
Comments will be subject to approval and should not be defamatory, obscene, racist, in breach of copyright, or contrary to law. The CPBF is not reponsible for any views expressed here.
Previous miscellany stories
Satellite broadcaster BSkyB returning £1bn to shareholders
Salford Council bans funding for Salford Star
Superdrug abuse
Media For All Policy Document
Alternative G20: Keep University of East London open
Burnham decision welcome
A homage to the British miners
The strike recorded
Optimistic AGM
Obituary: Jimmy Barnes
World Press Freedom Day 2008
Farewell to Geoff
Dispatches footage will be given to police
Post Office to First Amendment: Drop Dead 5
Where now for childrens TV?
Sri Lanka and the CPBF
AGM calls for new direction for the CPBF
Report of Work 2005
Give money to Greg Palast
The UK Terror plot: what's really going on?
The war on Palestine's orphans
Interpal accuses Panorama of lack of balance
Free Press index launched
Without Comment
How the US media destroy democracy
John Pilger
It’s Not Cricket
Without Comment
Without Comment
Digital TV and state abuse of power
-
Notices
Events & Announcements
World Press Freedom Day
More reporters are currently imprisoned in Turkey than in any other country in the world. Only a matter of weeks ago lawyers failed to persuade a Turkish court to release a 76-year-old journalist from a Turkish internet news station.
World Press Freedom Day on Friday May 3, 2013 is being marked in Britain by a rally to highlight the dangers facing journalists in Turkey and in this podcast, Nicholas Jones speaks to Barry White, Organiser at the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, and Sam Bamford, the TUC's policy officer for Eastern Europe and Africa about the importance of a campaign to highlight international press freedom.
The World Press Freedom Day rally is being staged by the National Union of Journalists at the NUJ head office, Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1 on Thursday May 2, 6pm-8pm.
DATELINE: 27/4/13
UK launch of EU media campaign
DATELINE: 13/3/13
The UK launch of a 'European Citizens' Initiative' calling for EU rules against concentration of media power will take place on Thursday March 21 from 11:00am – 12:30pm in Committee Room 4A at the House of Lords, London. Guest speakers will include actor and activist Hugh Grant (pictured), media consultant Claire Enders, Professor Steven Barnett, Barry McCall (President of the NUJ) and Marc Gruber (Director of the European Federation of Journalists).
A European Citizens' Initiative is an official petition, like a Downing Street petition. If it succeeds in gathering a million signatures across the EU, the Commission is obliged to respond.
This petition calls for the EU to act to protect media pluralism and press freedom.
CPBF Annual General Meeting
DATELINE: 1/3/13
Make a note in your diary
Saturday 13 July 2013 from 10.00am
NUJ HQ, 308/312 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1.
Leveson, media ownership, CPBF future work.
DOWNLOAD FREEPRESS NOW
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Download Freepress in PDF, ePub or mobi format. Issue 194 now available.
MEDIA FOR ALL CONFERENCE
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Papers from the Media for All Conference
MEDIA MANIFESTO
DATELINE: 26/3/10
The media’s job is to inform and entertain us but we rely on them too to tell us what our rulers and representatives are up to. In the run-up to the Iraq war the government used spin and disinformation in the media to create panic and mislead people. The truth is coming out now, but we need stronger, more independent media to be able to scrutinise governments and make informed choices.
-
Previous stories
Miscellany
Satellite broadcaster BSkyB returning £1bn to shareholders
Salford Council bans funding for Salford Star
Superdrug abuse
Media For All Policy Document
Alternative G20: Keep University of East London open
Burnham decision welcome
A homage to the British miners
The strike recorded
Optimistic AGM
Obituary: Jimmy Barnes
World Press Freedom Day 2008
Farewell to Geoff
Dispatches footage will be given to police
Post Office to First Amendment: Drop Dead 5
Where now for childrens TV?
Sri Lanka and the CPBF
AGM calls for new direction for the CPBF
Report of Work 2005
Give money to Greg Palast
The UK Terror plot: what's really going on?
The war on Palestine's orphans
Interpal accuses Panorama of lack of balance
Free Press index launched
Without Comment
How the US media destroy democracy
John Pilger
It’s Not Cricket
Without Comment
Without Comment
Digital TV and state abuse of power
