» SubscribeMain section
-
Top story
Baby P tragedy: Cameron's culpability should not be overlooked
Nicholas Jones
DATELINE: 30/5/11
David Cameron's culpability in helping to generate a hue and cry over the death of Baby P cannot be overlooked in the war of words between Sharon Shoesmith and Ed Balls. The death of 17-month-old Peter Connelly in the London Borough of Haringey in 2007 provoked a media firestorm which the Labour government felt it could not ignore. But Cameron, then Leader of the Opposition, was no innocent bystander. He was the first senior politician to endorse the Sun's demand for Shoesmith to be sacked from her job as Haringey's director of children's services.
The Sun pursued what became an unprecedented campaign of vilification directed against an individual local authority officer. In a matter of a few weeks the paper collected 1.4 million signatures for a petition calling for Shoesmith's dismissal – a petition which was personally backed by Cameron on the day it was launched in November 2008.
Guiding Cameron's hand behind the scenes was Andy Coulson, the former News of the World editor, who in the previous twelve months as the Conservative Party's director of communications had firmly aligned the Tory leader with the Sun's style of campaigning journalism.
Coulson was playing a pivotal role during a critical period for the Conservatives. Cameron and the then Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown were vying with each other to secure the Sun's blessing in the run-up to the forthcoming general election.
After Baby P's mother and stepfather were convicted at the Old Bailey in October 2008 for their part in his death, the Sun's readers were asked to support the paper's campaign to get the dismissal of the social workers involved in the case together with the head of Haringey's children's services.
In a signed article on the day the petition first appeared Cameron said that he and his wife Samantha could not bear to watch news reports of the trial. Cameron said: "Baby P was cruelly let down in life, but we won't let him down in death." (Sun, 13.11.2008)
It took six of the Sun's journalists to carry sacks containing the petition forms – complete with 1.4 million signatures – up to the front door of No.10 Downing Street for Prime Minister's attention.
Brown and Cameron were trying to outdo each other in their attempts to appease the Sun and it was hardly surprising after the Prime Minister was challenged by Cameron at Prime Minister's questions about the need for the government to intervene, that Balls, then the Children's Secretary, considered he had no alternative but to act and order Shoesmith's removal from office once Ofsted produced its damming report on the management of Haringey's children's department.
It was Balls' failure to allow Shoesmith the chance to respond to the Ofsted report which formed the basis of the Court of Appeal's judgement (27.5.2011) that she had been sacked unfairly. In welcoming the judgement she said it vindicated her criticism of Balls for having sacked her at a televised news conference. "I did not have the chance to respond to the Ofsted report. I was told there was going to be a news conference and I was sacked on live television."
In standing by his original decision and welcoming the government's decision to challenge the Court of Appeal's ruling, Balls denied that he had been playing to the gallery.
When interviewed on the World at One by Shaun Ley (27.5.2011), Balls said he acted because of terrible harm done to a small boy and a gross failure of children's services to protect him. "There was public outrage; there was huge pressure in the media..." Shaun Ley: "Is that why you acted in the way you did?" Balls: "There was huge pressure, including from opposition politicians, for me to act quickly...I said I would not reach a quick judgement but instead I asked independent inspectors to do a report. When the report arrived it pointed to a catastrophic management failure in Haringey."
Later on Channel Four News Balls again denied having acted impetuously in the face of a newspaper campaign. "It was not just about the media. People were very angry about what children's services had allowed to happen to a small boy. I don't play to the gallery or give way to that pressure."
Nonetheless there was no doubt in Downing Street that Brown was desperate to gain plaudits from the Sun. Balls' decision to remove Shoesmith from office – followed by her immediate sacking by Haringey – was greeted with banner headlines:
"Baby P victory AT LAST after 26 days and 1.4m voices, council boss Shoesmith axed." (Sun, 9.12.2008)Brown and Balls took the praise for having acted decisively...and in the process Downing Street closed down a story which Cameron had milked to his political advantage in the build-up to the general election.
Nicholas Jones is the author of Campaign 2010: The Making of the Prime Minister (Biteback).
Last modified: Monday, May 30, 2011
Your comments:
» Click here to add your comment.
Comments will be subject to approval and should not be defamatory, obscene, racist, in breach of copyright, or contrary to law. The CPBF is not reponsible for any views expressed here.
Previous government policy stories
BBC's Craig Oliver replacing Andy Coulson at No 10
Andy Coulson quits Downing Street communications role
Minister announces local TV channel plans
Minister plans to end 'net neutrality' for broadcasters who pay more
Is coalition government the end of spin?
BBC chief talks to No 10 about selling the cuts
Charles Atangana - deportation halted but keep up the pressure
Help stop this deportation
Ministry of Justice announces draft defamation bill
Rules on stop and search changed
2010 general election: game changer for politics...and media
Rules tightened for council-funded newspapers
Media policies after the election
What are Jeremy Hunt's priorities as the new culture secretary?
MPs pass Digital Economy Bill
Jack Straw unveils plan to curb libel tourism
Straw acts on libel fees
Government announcement on Television Product Placement
Libel laws group announced
Alastair Campbell's 'unprecedented' role in preparing dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
CPBF submission to DCMS consultation on product placement on television
Action on product placement
Scottish parliament inquiry into local newspaper decline
Straw to look at libel law reform
Response to Digital Britain
Simon will look at safeguards on product placement
Campaign opposes U-turn on product placement
Government to reverse policy on TV product placement
Damian McBride and the reality behind Labour smears
Little comfort for journalists in Digital Britain
-
Notices
Events & Announcements
World Press Freedom Day
More reporters are currently imprisoned in Turkey than in any other country in the world. Only a matter of weeks ago lawyers failed to persuade a Turkish court to release a 76-year-old journalist from a Turkish internet news station.
World Press Freedom Day on Friday May 3, 2013 is being marked in Britain by a rally to highlight the dangers facing journalists in Turkey and in this podcast, Nicholas Jones speaks to Barry White, Organiser at the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, and Sam Bamford, the TUC's policy officer for Eastern Europe and Africa about the importance of a campaign to highlight international press freedom.
The World Press Freedom Day rally is being staged by the National Union of Journalists at the NUJ head office, Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1 on Thursday May 2, 6pm-8pm.
DATELINE: 27/4/13
UK launch of EU media campaign
DATELINE: 13/3/13
The UK launch of a 'European Citizens' Initiative' calling for EU rules against concentration of media power will take place on Thursday March 21 from 11:00am – 12:30pm in Committee Room 4A at the House of Lords, London. Guest speakers will include actor and activist Hugh Grant (pictured), media consultant Claire Enders, Professor Steven Barnett, Barry McCall (President of the NUJ) and Marc Gruber (Director of the European Federation of Journalists).
A European Citizens' Initiative is an official petition, like a Downing Street petition. If it succeeds in gathering a million signatures across the EU, the Commission is obliged to respond.
This petition calls for the EU to act to protect media pluralism and press freedom.
CPBF Annual General Meeting
DATELINE: 1/3/13
Make a note in your diary
Saturday 13 July 2013 from 10.00am
NUJ HQ, 308/312 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1.
Leveson, media ownership, CPBF future work.
DOWNLOAD FREEPRESS NOW
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Download Freepress in PDF, ePub or mobi format. Issue 194 now available.
MEDIA FOR ALL CONFERENCE
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Papers from the Media for All Conference
MEDIA MANIFESTO
DATELINE: 26/3/10
The media’s job is to inform and entertain us but we rely on them too to tell us what our rulers and representatives are up to. In the run-up to the Iraq war the government used spin and disinformation in the media to create panic and mislead people. The truth is coming out now, but we need stronger, more independent media to be able to scrutinise governments and make informed choices.
-
Previous stories
Government Policy
BBC's Craig Oliver replacing Andy Coulson at No 10
Andy Coulson quits Downing Street communications role
Minister announces local TV channel plans
Minister plans to end 'net neutrality' for broadcasters who pay more
Is coalition government the end of spin?
BBC chief talks to No 10 about selling the cuts
Charles Atangana - deportation halted but keep up the pressure
Help stop this deportation
Ministry of Justice announces draft defamation bill
Rules on stop and search changed
2010 general election: game changer for politics...and media
Rules tightened for council-funded newspapers
Media policies after the election
What are Jeremy Hunt's priorities as the new culture secretary?
MPs pass Digital Economy Bill
Jack Straw unveils plan to curb libel tourism
Straw acts on libel fees
Government announcement on Television Product Placement
Libel laws group announced
Alastair Campbell's 'unprecedented' role in preparing dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
CPBF submission to DCMS consultation on product placement on television
Action on product placement
Scottish parliament inquiry into local newspaper decline
Straw to look at libel law reform
Response to Digital Britain
Simon will look at safeguards on product placement
Campaign opposes U-turn on product placement
Government to reverse policy on TV product placement
Damian McBride and the reality behind Labour smears
Little comfort for journalists in Digital Britain
