» SubscribeMain section
-
Top story
Phone hacking: Ed Miliband calls for inquiry into press abuses
Patrick Wintour, political editor Tuesday 19 April 2011
DATELINE: 20/4/11
Ed Miliband has become the first political leader to call for an independent review of newspaper regulation and practices after the admission by News International that it hacked into the phones of celebrities and politicians then failed to carry out full inquiries into the wrongdoing.
Miliband told the Guardian: "I think there does need to be a review after the police inquiries have been completed and any criminal cases that flow from it.
"I think it is in the interests of protecting the reputation of the British press that these matters should not simply be left to rest, and lessons have to be learned."
He is aware that a front-rank politician, especially a party leader, is taking a political risk by challenging the media over its practices, including the powerful News International stable, but he argued: "The press itself will want to look at how self-regulation can be made to work better because it clearly did not work very well in relation to these issues here."
He went on: "What happened was very bad, and it is right to say that, but there are very good traditions in our press, and they have to be maintained, but we have to get rid of the bad ones, and we have to find a way of doing that."
He argued: "My strong instincts are that we do not want governmental regulation of these issues, but I don't think the Press Complaints Commission has covered itself in glory."
The PCC, chaired by the Tory peer Lady Buscombe, is responsible for newspaper regulation and has been widely criticised for failing to challenge News International over the scale of phone hacking.
Miliband said: "It is not about government imposing this on the press, but I think the review needs to have some independence, both from government and from those involved in the day-to-day running of newspapers. I think that would help the industry. There has to be a sense that the future is not going to be like the past. Wider lessons have to be learned." He stressed he had no grand plans about who should run the inquiry.
Labour is aware that Lord Fowler, the chairman of the Lords communications select committee and a former Conservative party chairman, has been calling for a judge-led inquiry into the newspaper industry.
Miliband added: "I would separate out the backward looking issue of who did what wrong, and any criminalitity, on the one hand and the forward looking issue of what lessons need to be learned."
He stressed: "The immediate priority is to have this police inquiry, for it to do its work and to get to the bottom of what really happened. We now know because News Interantional have said so the media did some things they regret. This inquiry has got to take its course and it is very important it does that".
He added: "My clear view is that self regulation continues to be the right thing. We do not want the government regulating the press."
He was also pleased the police were investigating suggestions that newspapers regularly paid police for stories. "The first police investigation clearly did not uncover the full facts, but in the second investigation they seem to be going about it the right way, and I am sure they too will want learn lessons from it."
In a wide-ranging interview while on the election trail, Miliband also disclosed he was engaging closely with the so-called "Blue Labour" project associated with Lord Glasman, the controversial political theoretician ennobled by Miliband.
Glasman has argued Labour has become disconnected from its traditional working class voters by developing a top-down model of government that became remote, bossy and managerial.
Miliband said: "People value local institutions in their lives that go beyond the bottom line from the local high street, the local post office, the NHS and the local Sure Start. Local people have got be able to have more say about their area, its character and whether they have a local Tesco. People have got to have more say about 24-hour drinking and nightclubs, and what is changing in their area. We need strong communities."
He said he disagreed with Glasman's claim in a forthcoming interview that Labour caused a massive rupture of trust by lying about immigration, but said the party had to talk more about the big issues underlying immigration's impact on working-class people, including the undercutting of wages.
"I don't agree we lied," he said. "We underestimated the impact of eastern European migration and flexible labour markets. The two came together and we got aspects of that badly wrong."
He also said the elections on 5 May represented "a chance to change the contours of British politics for the rest of the parliament" and he did not rule out the coalition imploding if the Lib Dems were hit hard.
Nick Clegg had made a fundamental mistake in aligning himself with the Conservatives and becoming a prisoner of David Cameron, Miliband argued.
He suggested trust in the Lib Dem leader had been destroyed. "There is a fundamental lesson about politics – if you go round making promises and then breaking them, it is disastrous for you personally and pretty bad for politics generally, and that is what has happened.
"When you say you are going to vote against rise in tuition fees and parade round students saying that and then do the opposite, it just makes people cynical and jaded."
He also promised to say more about the Labour government's mistakes. Faced by polls showing the party is blamed by most people for the deficit, he accepts "there is more work to win back economic credibility".
He added: "We have been very clear about mistakes on bank regulation and the fact that we did not build a broad enough industrial base.
"We should have acknowledged earlier that our four-year deficit reduction plan did involve spending cuts, but what I am not going to do is to buy into the Tory argument that the deficit is all the fault of Labour overspending.
"It is not true, it is just not true, I am not going to say because it is not the case."
Last modified: Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Your comments:
It may leave a door open but I wouldn't necessarily hold my breath. I saw it as a diversion from the main issue - BSkyB.
Posted by: Joy Johnson: 21 Apr, 2011 11:46:08Wondered if anyone had any particular views on Ed Miliband's widely reported (but pretty vague) call for an "inquiry into press abuses". Didn't find it hugely exciting myself as he wants it after the police investigations and persists in not calling for a freeze on the BSkyB deal. Nonetheless, does it finally signify a little break from the past and a move in the right direction? Been reading all I can find on this all day, and am really not sure.
However .... last night (19th April) on Twitter, Tom Watson warmly welcomed Ed's call. I tweeted him my dismay about the BSkyB omission. Today I received a rather intriguing reply from Tom Watson, saying he was working on something on this for later in the week (presumably tomorrow.) Am therefore hoping there is more going on behind the Labour scenes than I realised.
Posted by: Jacquie Reed: 21 Apr, 2011 11:44:47
» Click here to add your comment.
Comments will be subject to approval and should not be defamatory, obscene, racist, in breach of copyright, or contrary to law. The CPBF is not reponsible for any views expressed here.
Previous journalism theory & practice stories
Anarchy in the UK plc
The crisis in media and journalism - what to do?
Communication via the web 'came of age' in 2010 general election
On libel, the really big battle awaits
Science writer Simon Singh wins libel appeal
Google to limit free news access
Can Britain's national newspapers reinvent themselves online?
Subsidies for journalists: we say 'Yes'
Irresponsible Journalism in the United Kingdom
Journalism is alive and well
Irresponsible Journalism in the United Kingdom
NUJ claims media exploits young workers
The poor, the unions and the media
Media freedom in Europe under threat
Behind Flat Earth News
New threats to media freedom
Countdown to media freedom conference with Alan Johnston
Lords hear case for journalism
Regulation under the spotlight
Paul Foot award 2007
Does Islamophobia exist?
Beyond the veil
Orwell in Tribune: "As I Please" and other writings 1943-7
Are we moving from their media to ours?
What We Stand For
Text Size
Journalism gets younger and cheaper
The Angry Buzz: This Week and Current Affairs Television
Text Size
A Voice for Media Freedom
-
Notices
Events & Announcements
World Press Freedom Day
More reporters are currently imprisoned in Turkey than in any other country in the world. Only a matter of weeks ago lawyers failed to persuade a Turkish court to release a 76-year-old journalist from a Turkish internet news station.
World Press Freedom Day on Friday May 3, 2013 is being marked in Britain by a rally to highlight the dangers facing journalists in Turkey and in this podcast, Nicholas Jones speaks to Barry White, Organiser at the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom, and Sam Bamford, the TUC's policy officer for Eastern Europe and Africa about the importance of a campaign to highlight international press freedom.
The World Press Freedom Day rally is being staged by the National Union of Journalists at the NUJ head office, Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1 on Thursday May 2, 6pm-8pm.
DATELINE: 27/4/13
UK launch of EU media campaign
DATELINE: 13/3/13
The UK launch of a 'European Citizens' Initiative' calling for EU rules against concentration of media power will take place on Thursday March 21 from 11:00am – 12:30pm in Committee Room 4A at the House of Lords, London. Guest speakers will include actor and activist Hugh Grant (pictured), media consultant Claire Enders, Professor Steven Barnett, Barry McCall (President of the NUJ) and Marc Gruber (Director of the European Federation of Journalists).
A European Citizens' Initiative is an official petition, like a Downing Street petition. If it succeeds in gathering a million signatures across the EU, the Commission is obliged to respond.
This petition calls for the EU to act to protect media pluralism and press freedom.
CPBF Annual General Meeting
DATELINE: 1/3/13
Make a note in your diary
Saturday 13 July 2013 from 10.00am
NUJ HQ, 308/312 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1.
Leveson, media ownership, CPBF future work.
DOWNLOAD FREEPRESS NOW
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Download Freepress in PDF, ePub or mobi format. Issue 194 now available.
MEDIA FOR ALL CONFERENCE
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Papers from the Media for All Conference
MEDIA MANIFESTO
DATELINE: 26/3/10
The media’s job is to inform and entertain us but we rely on them too to tell us what our rulers and representatives are up to. In the run-up to the Iraq war the government used spin and disinformation in the media to create panic and mislead people. The truth is coming out now, but we need stronger, more independent media to be able to scrutinise governments and make informed choices.
-
Previous stories
Journalism Theory & Practice
Anarchy in the UK plc
The crisis in media and journalism - what to do?
Communication via the web 'came of age' in 2010 general election
On libel, the really big battle awaits
Science writer Simon Singh wins libel appeal
Google to limit free news access
Can Britain's national newspapers reinvent themselves online?
Subsidies for journalists: we say 'Yes'
Irresponsible Journalism in the United Kingdom
Journalism is alive and well
Irresponsible Journalism in the United Kingdom
NUJ claims media exploits young workers
The poor, the unions and the media
Media freedom in Europe under threat
Behind Flat Earth News
New threats to media freedom
Countdown to media freedom conference with Alan Johnston
Lords hear case for journalism
Regulation under the spotlight
Paul Foot award 2007
Does Islamophobia exist?
Beyond the veil
Orwell in Tribune: "As I Please" and other writings 1943-7
Are we moving from their media to ours?
What We Stand For
Text Size
Journalism gets younger and cheaper
The Angry Buzz: This Week and Current Affairs Television
Text Size
A Voice for Media Freedom
